The Soham Parekh Saga: What a Serial Moonlighter Reveals About Startup Hiring Gaps
In a cautionary tale for Silicon Valley, Soham Parekh—a software engineer operating from India—has been exposed for simultaneously working at multiple startups, many of them Y Combinator-backed. Despite repeated dismissals, Parekh continued to secure roles, leveraging his technical skill and ability to interview well. His actions have sparked conversations around trust, remote hiring, and operational due diligence in the tech industry.
The Spark: One Viral Post, Millions of Views
The story gained traction after Playground AI CEO Suhail Doshi posted a warning on X, calling attention to Parekh’s pattern of deception. Doshi alleged that Parekh had been juggling three to four startup jobs at once and had been preying on companies in the Y Combinator ecosystem. The post received nearly 20 million views, prompting a cascade of similar revelations from other founders.
An Alarming Pattern Across Startups
Several startups—Lindy, Antimetal, Sync Labs, and more—confirmed they had either hired or interviewed Parekh. Most were unaware he was already employed elsewhere. Founders cited inconsistencies in his story, dubious IP activity, and unexplained GitHub contributions as eventual red flags. Despite this, many also acknowledged Parekh’s impressive technical ability, which initially helped him pass interviews with flying colors.
Remote Work and the Due Diligence Gap
The incident exposes a glaring vulnerability in current hiring practices—particularly for remote roles. In Parekh’s case, location misrepresentation and repeated interview rescheduling should have prompted deeper scrutiny. Yet, across startups from different sectors—AI automation, cloud cost optimization, lip-syncing tools, and developer agents—his applications advanced with minimal verification.
It’s a stark reminder that talent alone shouldn’t be a shield against rigorous background checks, especially in a distributed work era.
Parekh’s Defense: Financial Strain and Passion for Work
Speaking on the Technology Business Programming Network (TBPN), Parekh admitted to working multiple jobs since 2022. He claimed financial hardship was the main driver, and denied using AI tools or outsourced help to manage his workload. Remarkably, he stated he worked 140 hours a week and insisted his commitment came from genuine enthusiasm for each company’s mission.
However, contradictions remain. He claimed to have deferred grad school for work, yet allegedly listed a completed master’s from Georgia Tech on his résumé. His explanation for not negotiating better pay with one employer: a desire to keep personal and professional life separate.
Turning Controversy into Opportunity
Parekh announced his latest role at Darwin Studios, an AI video remixing startup, only to have the announcement and supporting posts swiftly deleted. The founder later issued a brief statement praising Parekh’s capabilities.
This aligns with a growing trend in tech: turning controversy into momentum. Companies like Cluely have built brands on viral provocation, and it remains to be seen whether Parekh’s notoriety translates into long-term opportunity—or further fallout.
Conclusion: Lessons for the Startup Ecosystem
The Soham Parekh episode underscores the need for more robust hiring frameworks, especially for early-stage companies and remote-first teams. Charisma and code can no longer be the sole currency of trust. A more disciplined approach to due diligence, identity verification, and IP monitoring may be critical in an age where boundaries between roles—and ethics—continue to blur.
Explore Business Solutions from Uttkrist and our Partners, Pipedrive CRM and more: uttkrist.com/explore
