AI Access to Personal Data: What You’re Really Giving Away

The Growing Scope of AI Access to Personal Data

AI access to personal data is becoming alarmingly pervasive. From web browsers to meeting assistants, AI tools increasingly demand sweeping permissions under the pretense of efficiency. Perplexity’s AI-powered browser, Comet, is a case in point. While designed to streamline workflows—summarizing emails or automating calendar events—it simultaneously requests broad access to your Google account. This includes managing drafts, sending emails, downloading contacts, and copying entire employee directories.

Even if this data is stored locally, users are still handing over significant control. The justification? To improve AI models not just for you—but for everyone else.

Everyday Apps, Extraordinary Access

The concern extends well beyond Comet. A trend is emerging among AI applications offering productivity tools—call transcriptions, meeting notes, automated bookings—that require real-time access to calendars, private conversations, and even unreleased camera roll photos. Meta’s AI features have also tested such boundaries, seeking to integrate deeply into the user’s digital footprint.

AI tools may claim to “save time,” but their real currency is your data. The issue is not whether the data is used maliciously—it’s that it is accessed at all.

False Trade-Offs: Convenience vs. Control

Industry voices like Signal President Meredith Whittaker have described this as “putting your brain in a jar.” If a chatbot books a table for you, it may require access to your browser (and its stored passwords), credit card details, calendar, and contacts. These requests are far from trivial—they’re systemic intrusions masked as features.

What appears to be a minor time-saver comes at the cost of irreversible exposure. You hand over years of inbox history, calendar entries, messages, and browsing data—often in one click.

The Risks of Autonomous AI Agents

Beyond access, many AI assistants are granted agency—the ability to act on your behalf. This delegation is risky. AI models still hallucinate, misfire, or make decisions based on flawed interpretations. Worse, when they malfunction, companies often have human reviewers sift through your private prompts to troubleshoot.

And yet, users consent to this cascade of access—hoping the benefits outweigh the breach. Often, they don’t.

What Should Users Do Next?

A flashlight app requesting your location used to be the red flag. Today, it’s AI demanding control over your professional and personal data archives. The parallel is direct—and alarming.

AI tools that require expansive data access for seemingly minor functions should raise immediate concerns. Before approving any permission request, users must ask: Is what I’m getting worth what I’m giving up?

Explore Business Solutions from Uttkrist and our Partners’, Pipedrive CRM and more uttkrist.com/explore